NJ Supreme Court Committee Solicits Input on Educational Advocates
December 01, 2020
Proposed limitations to advocates’ scope of practice draws community opposition
On September 30, 2020, the New Jersey Supreme Court’s Committee on the Unauthorized Practice of Law released a ruling and related opinion that would make it more difficult for non-attorney advocates to advise special education students and their parents in Individualized Educational Program (IEP) meetings and mediation conferences.
Non-attorney advocates often play an important role to ensure students access their educational rights and IEP-mandated services. The Committee’s opinion, known as “Opinion 56,” sparked concern in the special education community when it was released. In response, the Committee suspended implementation of the opinion and solicited public comment.
Our colleagues at the Education Law Center (ELC) provided an incisive legal analysis and compelling moral explanation outlining the opposition and the impact this opinion could have, if implemented. A leading authority on special education matters, ELC Senior Attorney, Elizabeth Athos, Esq., authored their extensive public comments.
We will continue to monitor this issue, advocate as needed, and provide updates as soon as they become available.
If you have any questions about your special education rights, are considering looking for a non-attorney advocate or lawyer, or need additional assistance, please reach out to our 800.4.AUTISM Helpline.
Experience our Power of Connection
We continue to work hard to fulfill our mission on behalf of the autism community, advocating for their rights and for essential services, from school to adulthood.
We’re proud to say that, since the beginning of the pandemic, not one call to our Helpline has gone unanswered. If you need assistance, call us at 800.4.AUTISM or email@example.com or send us a message/chat with us via the link at the bottom of this page.